Video is Awesome


Qυісk facts аbουt online video. Dіԁ уου know thаt іt іѕ thе fastest growing media іn thе world? Video іѕ аƖѕο thе mοѕt engaging media! Facts аbουt using video οn thе Internet. www.klok.fi

12 Responses to Video is Awesome

  1. Danilio2020

    Fantastic looks but where are the sources?

  2. Viditude

    Really well done! Like this infographics in animation mode! I want to add this as an example in my video class i’m teaching at the local adult school.

  3. pickledparsleyparty

    The comparison of adoption speed of radio, TV, the internet and Facebook is questionable. I’m sure familiarity with the fundamentals of those technologies had something to do with those differences. (i.e. TV can be understood as radio you can see, so familiarity with TV at its birth is greater than familiarity with radio at its birth). Also, I’ll bet availability of enabling technology had something to do with them (at Internet’s birth, people had to reckon about affording dial up; but at FB’s?)

  4. chust1n

    1:53
    + Adult content

  5. vamshiinhell

    Is this slideshow also a video?

  6. Sabotaged858

    @liphos If you PsychInfo the first point you made, you would see that it’s valid. Video is slower (if you skim text), but it is also more fascinating to an overwhelming majority of people. There are several reasons why, but the largest one is simply that it stimulates more senses. The written word is alas dying

  7. philsk8thrill

    Not citing sources is the largest issue with video facts!

  8. immoprofi

    fantastic & nice

  9. immoprofi

    fantastic

  10. friendofyou

    “The claim at 00:20 that video is 8.33 more fascinating than text is bogus – video is just 8.33 slower to digest than quickly scanning a body of text with meaningful headings.”

    Really agree. But yes, nice look! KLOK is a creative agency and not a research department with scientists, maybe that clarifies the presentation :)

  11. liphos

    The claim at 00:20 that video is 8.33 more fascinating than text is bogus — video is just 8.33 slower to digest than quickly scanning a body of text with meaningful headings.

    Most of the other “facts” are also quite arguable or meaningless. But the looks are nice ;)

  12. yelton7

    ummmm ok?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments links could be nofollow free.